Archive for September, 2010

Beloved tennis club operator to stay

September 29th, 2010

A long battle has finally ended in a victory for the Greens and the Rushcutters Bay community with the contract for the management of the local tennis courts being awardedtennis-happy.jpg to Rory Miles, the much loved operator of the site who has done a fantastic job of managing the courts for the last 27 years.  

Earlier this year it didn’t look like this story would have such a happy ending.  Lord Mayor Clover Moore and her party of “independents” vigorously supported a recommendation by Council staff that all Council owned tennis facilities be placed in the hands of a single operator, tossing Mr Miles out of his job.  See this post, which I made on the issue at that time, for more information. 

The Greens Councillors opposed this recommendation on the grounds that the tender process leading up to it was flawed in a number of ways.  It didn’t properly account for the contributions existing operators had made to the community, which in the case of Mr Miles included extensive free tuition and court time provided to local disadvantaged kids.  It also ignored the fact that he had been provided with a $100 000 per annum grant from the charity Franks Family to further this work with disadvantaged and indigenous children.

Additionally it was inconsistent in its treatment of the various tenderers.  One was excluded for emailing Councillors about their application as this was considered ‘lobbying’, however a second tenderer was excused after undertaking a similar action and went on to become the recommended winning tenderer.  When I tabled legal advice stating that this inconsistency was unacceptable Clover Moore scrambled to suspend the tender process and ultimately deemed it necessary to be restarted.

The new tender process was carried out in a far more rigorous and equitable manner.  Once the contribution to the community of each of the operators was properly accounted for it became clear that Mr Miles was the operator best placed to carry on the management of the Rushcutters Bay courts.

The level of community support behind this operator was phenomenal and I’m very pleased to see we’ve finally had a positive outcome.  Rory Miles has gone through hell over this issue and been forced to spend around $55 000 negotiating his way through Clover Moore’s attempts to get rid of him.  I’m sure that he and the tennis players of Rushcutters Bay will be most relieved that he’s now able to go back to doing what he does best, teaching tennis and operating a much loved social tennis club.  


Laneway grants review a welcome opportunity to end corporate welfare

September 27th, 2010

Council last week made the sensible decision to suspend the giving of grants under the laneways revitalisation scheme, pending a full review of the program.  While the idea of enlivening disused laneways is a good one the current program, which focuses almost exclusively on financially propping up small bars, has been a complete waste of ratepayers money.

Under the program Council doles out tens of thousands of dollars every few months to businesses, mostly bars, that in many cases could get along fine without the money.  It is basically a form of corporate welfare and I have long opposed it in Council.

Two recent examples that highlight the misguided nature of the program are those of Berta Bar and the Moran Arts Foundation, which were each given $30 000.  Berta Bar was already open, receiving rave reviews and filling close to capacity most nights before the grant was awarded.  They were operating at a cracking pace without Council assistance and the $30 000 would likely have gone straight to a private entrepreneur’s bottom line.

The Moran Arts Foundation applied for the grant to assist an art gallery and coffee shop.  The coffee shop is located in a building owned by the Moran Group of companies which is worth over $286 million and pays commercial rent to the group.  The coffee shop was a private business venture by a very wealthy corporation and would have opened whether or not they got the grant.

In a third case a grant to establish a bar was given to a person who made a living running gambling tips websites.  When Council investigated this person’s business background at my request they reported that the online gambling business was “less than successful”.  I think most people will agree that giving a person with a poor track record of business management public money to run a business is not the best use of that money.

The review into the laneway scheme was prompted by questions over the latter two cases and I hope Council will use this opportunity to come up with more useful and innovative ways to activate the City’s lanes.

Rather than subsidising individual businesses Council should be incorporating laneways into its events and festivals.  A perfect example of this is the reception to shortly be held in a laneway bar as part of the ‘Art and About’ festival.  This draws the public’s attention to these businesses and will help boost their custom, which is much more sustainable than spoon-feeding them public money.

Or the City could use the money that was previously just being given away to cross-promote these businesses at other City supported events.  This could be done at things like the musical Jersey Boys, which will bring large numbers of visitors to Sydney, many of whom will be looking for a quiet spot for dinner or a drink after the show. 

The options for creating a lively social scene in what were once dark and dangerous laneways are wide ranging.  Council needs to focus on a range of creative, effective and equitable solutions that do more than just give public money to private businesses.

 


Sustainable Barangaroo nothing but spin

September 10th, 2010

The Barangaroo Delivery Authority (BDA) is continuing with its practice of public deception, this time with its claims of environmental sustainability for the project. Thisbarangaroo-model-edit-2.bmp became apparent when City of Sydney Councillors were briefed on Monday 30th August by Lend Lease and BDA staff. It appears that claims that the development will be carbon neutral, water positive and zero waste are simply false. Further, the BDA has admitted that it has no power over the provision of light rail to the site and that this has been left in the hands of the state government.  Given state Labor’s appalling record on delivering public transport projects the prospects of efficient light rail integrating Barangaroo with the City appear to be slim. 

When I questioned Lend Lease staff about precise details of their carbon neutral strategy it emerged that only 3% of the energy used on the site will be from onsite renewable energy generation with the balance being accounted for by simply purchasing offsets - these can be cancelled at any time. There is no commitment to trigeneration aside from a vague statement about discussions with the City.  It seems from this briefing that claims of a zero carbon development, which have also been publicly touted by BDA Board member Lord Mayor Clover Moore, are at best spin and at worst blatantly untrue. 

When I sought more detail on the “water positive” claim by the BDA the Lend Lease presenter admitted that all potable water to the site would come from the same source as the rest of Sydney – Warragamba Dam. Claims that the site will be self sufficient for water were entirely false. 

Spin was again evident with claims of zero waste. The facts are that waste will be removed from the site with the Lend Lease presenter giving hazy details of the proposed use of an alternative waste treatment provider.  It was admitted that 13%barangaroo-model-edit-1.bmp of waste would still go to land fill. This is no different to what the City of Sydney already does to deal with part of it’s residential waste stream.  The simple fact is that the Lend Lease plan will not create a zero waste solution for Barangaroo. 

The last straw came when Lend Lease was asked for details of the light rail link. The presenter said that it was not the responsibility of the developer and that it would have to be provided by the state government. When the BDA were asked about the light rail they admitted that such a link to Barangaroo was desirable but there was no certainty that it would be delivered, despite it being used as a central plank in the “low car” plan for Barangaroo.  It should also be noted that the very first building application Lend Lease submitted for the project was a request for permission to build a commercial underground carpark for 800+ cars. This is another blow to the the promise that the site will be supported by sustainable transport. 

Lend Lease have lodged further amendments to the approved concept plan seeking increases in gross floor area, extra buildings and increases in height. If approved the result will be a gross overdevelopment and a misuse of public assets by a terminal state government. The BDA have engaged in deception since day one in relation to the type and scale of development on the site. It appears that they are also seeking to mislead the public on the sustainability aspects at Barangaroo. 

The Barangaroo development will be built from the ground up and so it is a unique opportunity to deliver a world leading example of cutting edge technology to deal with power generation, water recycling and capture, emission free public transport and waste treatment.  Following the briefing I have no confidence that such technology will even be required by the development consent and it looks like business as usual for Lend Lease and the BDA. Unless strict standards are mandated by the Minister for Planning, Barangaroo will be a lost opportunity to do something that sets new standards and seriously addresses the climate change impact of a large urban development.                                 

      

      

      

      

      

      

      

      

 

 

 

 

 



If you would like to make a positive contribution to Australian politics, get involved by helping The Greens.

Greens Principles

  • Social and economic justice
  • Ecological sustainability
  • Peace and non-violence
  • Grassroots democracy