Councillor Chris Harris

Hot on the heels of their destruction of the habitat area at Orphan School Creek with the freshly laid concrete zig zag path, the Clover Moore Party are at it again across the road in Johnstons Canal with more habitat destruction.  The proposal is a bike path that links the shared pathway emerging from Orphan School Creek as it crosses Wigram Rd at Forest Lodge.

Two pathways have been outlined by City staff. The one favoured by Clover Moore Party councillors  proceeds along the eastern side of the canal between Wigram Rd and a bridge across the canal about 150 metres away. This area contains about 5 metres of council land immediately adjacent to the canal and joins seamlessly with the backyards of 22 terrace homes that front Minogue Crescent. Currently there is a dirt ‘goat track’ that is used by the occasional recreational cyclist, mothers with little kids in prams and people walking their dogs. These uses have happily coexisted with the local residents for years but all that is about to change.

The Lord Mayor’s concrete and steel brigade have voted to build a 2.5 metre wide concrete path with regular 3.5 metre light poles. This new commuter cyclepath will be lit up like a carnival, it will attract a lot more cyclists and totally destroy this idyllic little haven. The impact on the residents will be considerable.

When I visited the site with Greens colleague, Cr Doutney, we saw corellas feeding their young, sulphur crested cockatoos munching the freshly mown grass seed and multiple varieties of birdlife – night time brings out possums & other native animals.

There is a perfectly good alternative route for this section of the cycleway just metres away on the other side of the canal. Booth lane is a very seldom used laneway that hosts a Housing NSW development on one side of the road and a private multi unit development on the other. Both of these have adequate on site parking for residents. The laneway contains 8 parking spaces that could easily be converted into a two way cycleway that terminates at Taylor St. Taylor St is a very wide & quiet dead end street that leads straight into the park where the shared path cycleway will continue down to the parklands around Roselle Bay.

Clover Moore councillors refused to consider the alternative ‘on road’ route but have decided instead on habitat destruction, increased conflict with cyclists and the loss of the peaceful glade enjoyed by the 22 homes along Minogue Cres. This choice is totally unnecessary.

Leichhardt Council will shortly be spending around $700,000 on Taylor St to convert it into a model sustainable street. What better addition to this project than the inclusion of sustainable transport. The traffic movements on Booth Lane and Taylor St are very low and it would be an ideal and easy path for both recreational & commuter cyclists with little potential conflict with cars or pedestrians

Residents of Minogue Cres, who have not been properly consulted, turned up at council on 22nd February to express their view and were refused an opportunity to address councillors when the Clover Moore Party voted as a block to deny them the right to speak. Once again Forrest Lodge residents are being ignored.

Thanks to local resident Alexandra Brunner for images of the site as it is now in it’s unconcreted state.

The Barangaroo Authority conducted a presentation of the design ideas of British architect Richard Rogers at the City Recital Hall on 23rd February. The presentation visuals showed attractive buildings and public spaces that interfaced with the water at the city’s western edge with a light rail service passing down Hickson Rd.

One key component of the design, repeatedly referred to as ”the public pier”, was in fact the platform for a 213 metre private hotel located on half a hectare of the harbour that will have to be reclaimed (image created by the Sydney Morning Herald as viewed from Pyrmont Bridge). The proposed hotel juts 150 metres into the harbour and effectively blocks half the waterway separating Barangaroo & Darling Island.

The presentation contained many worthwhile ideas but there was virtually no mention of the hotel from Mr Keating or the two architects who presented the design. It seemed as though they were trying to slip it through without anyone noticing.

Once a questioner raised the hotel issue Mr Keating responded by saying that the building was a response to ‘1960s’ industrial vandalism’, would be an “exclamation mark” for the western city and that the reclamation of part of the harbour would “break up the monotony of the shoreline”.

It seems to me that mother nature created a beautiful canvas when she shaped Sydney harbour and it appears pretty arrogant to suggest that we humans can improve that with a massive private ‘for profit’ enterprise in the shape of a hotel to “break up the monotony”.

The hotel is a savage intrusion on Sydney Harbour and creates a precedent that will enable future premiers, in cahoots with their political mates, to construct a pier with a giant building anywhere in the harbour that takes their fancy. Just imagine a future “public pier” with a 200 metre hotel at the end of White Bay or Pyrmont Point . There is no reason that this could not happen if the Barangaroo Authority gets away with this. For those who have invested a million or two dollars in a harbour waterfront apartment I’d have to say ‘be very afraid’ of a precedent like this.

Mr Keating also called the Sydney Morning Herald “intellectually corrupt” and acting with “shocking arrogance” when the newspaper published an impression of how this proposal would look from Pyrmont Bridge.

The proposed built form will completely overwhelm the northern view of the harbour from Pyrmont and will compromise the beauty of the stunning waterway for all except those who approach from the West in a helicopter. The Herald has exposed the government’s spin with the published image and I hope that the public loudly condemns what is clearly a massive over-development on this last iconic piece of post industrial harbour.   
 

On the day that Justice Jayne Jagot found for the developer in the Carlton United Breweries (CUB) case she highlighted the fact that courts do not make merit decisions, they simply uphold the law.  Whether or not that law is a donkey’s bottom is irrelevant, it’s the law.

For all of those who had believed there was a chance for the environment and for Sydney to come out of its industrial revolution, smog-infested thinking, it was a very bleak day indeed.

Then from the gloom of the courtroom there was suddenly hope in a Chippendale café coming from the most unexpected source – the developer.

Unlike Foster’s - the previous owners of the CUB site who wouldn’t even return phone calls let alone agree to a meeting - the Singapore based Frasers Group wanted to talk.

Ecological sustainability of the CUB site is the fundamental core of the community’s problem with the development. This community is as Elizabeth Farrelly articulated in her piece (Fooled again by a system that stinks SMH 22/8/07) “neither stupid nor intransigent nor luddite; they know that development must happen and that sustainability demands density.” Read the rest of this entry »

The environment.
R.I.P.

It was a black day for Sydney as Justice Jagot in the NSW Land & Environment Court ruled against the environment in favor of unsustainable development and the unfettered powers of Minister Sartor.

This was the first Australian case (Drake-Brockman v Minister for Planning) dealing with the climate change effects of a large urban development. The development – the Carlton United Brewery site (CUB) in Chippendale – was formerly owned by Foster’s Ltd and recently acquired by Singapore based Frasers Property. 

Justice Jagot upheld that while Minister Sartor should encourage sustainable development, under the law the Minister was not compelled to, nor was it in the court’s jurisdiction to force the Minister to do so.
 
Deputy Lord Mayor, Greens Councillor Chris Harris: “Under Part 3A Minister Sartor can do whatever he likes to the environment and the Land and Environment Court is powerless to stop him. 
 
“Thanks to this ruling, the CUB development could legally spew out millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions from the 2300 cars approved for the site. Using coal-fired generated electricity it could pump hundreds of thousands of litres of water to the site and hundreds of thousands of litres of sewage from the site and into the harbour every year.   Not only that but this development will be the benchmark for every other development approved in the city.

“If Labor wanted to lower the bar on sustainability and kill off the environment they couldn’t have found a better man for the job than Mr Sartor.

“Ironically businesses, schools and ordinary Australians are the ones coming up with innovative ideas to counter climate change. Hopefully Frasers will join this group and differentiate themselves  from Fosters and the Labor government who are so blinded by the pollution they create that they sacrifice future generations for profit?” Cr Harris said.

The judgement in full can be found here.

The court case, Matthew Drake-Brockman v the Minister for Planning and others (Foster’s has sold the CUB site to Frasers) regarding the environmental disaster that will be the Carlton United Brewery development has completed.

In two days of debate barristers for both sides argued the case for the importance of ensuring that environmentally sustainable measures were incorporated into the approval process for the site.

With climate change threatening the way we live it was astonishing to hear counsel for the Minister and Frasers argue that “ESD (ecologically sustainability development) should not take primacy over economics” and that under Part 3A the Minister is under “no obligation to take ESD considerations into account.”

Tell that to the future generations when their health, work opportunities and environment are destroyed.

We now await a judgement within the next few weeks.

Below I have included a summary of the arguments in the CUB Hearing including the submission from Francis Douglas QC, counsel for Drake-Brockman.

I would like to thank everyone who took an interest and supported this landmark case that deals with climate change in an urban development. If you would like to read the full submission please email me at charris@cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au and I will send these to you.

Cheers 
Deputy Lord Mayor of Sydney
Greens Cr Chris Harris Read the rest of this entry »