Archive for the 'Environment' Category

The road to urban sustainability

December 3rd, 2010

When one thinks of sustainable infrastructure, roads are one of the last things that generally come to mind.  These lifeless, impermeable surfaces are used by greenhouse gas belching vehicles and contribute to heating up our urban environments, making them the enemy of many a dedicated “greenie”.  However roads could be made a lot more sustainable than they are, and given that they cover around one third of the land area in the City of Sydney Local Government Area there is a lot to be gained by making improvements in this field. 

After extensive consultation with urban sustainability expert Michael Mobbs I’ve come up with three key actions to make our roads more sustainable.  I’ll be trying over the coming weeks and months to persuade council to set up a demonstration sustainable road where these schemes are implemented and that, if successful, will serve as a model for the more widespread greening of roads across Sydney and elsewhere. 

The image gives an indication of a range of things that can be done to make our streets more sustainable while details of three key actions in this process are outlined below.  (If you have trouble viewing the image, click here sustainable-road-design.pdf)

mm_sustainable-road-design.jpg

Verge plantings

The big problem with roads, aside from the cars that use them, is how unnatural their surfaces are.  The asphalt that roads are made from doesn’t absorb water like soil in bushland does; rather it lets it all run off.  While roads don’t absorb water they do absorb far more heat than most natural surfaces and as a result of these two factors they make a significant contribution to the ‘urban heat island effect’.

The urban heat island effect is the phenomenon whereby cities are up to 7oC warmer than corresponding undeveloped areas.  7 oC can be the difference between a pleasant 25 oC and a scorching 32 oC.  As well as making our cities less pleasant the urban heat island effect results in big increases in power bills and greenhouse gas emissions as a result of greater air-conditioner use and makes a significant contribution to the number of heat related illnesses and deaths suffered every year.

One obvious way to help counter this effect is to make our urban environments more closely resemble their cooler natural counterparts and an easy way to do this is through the use of roadside vegetation.

Vegetation can help to cool an urban environment in many ways.  Firstly, trees provide shade that help people, and highly heat absorbent roads, stay out of direct sunlight.  Secondly, trees contribute to evaporative cooling as a result of water vapour being emitted from leaves.

Finally, vegetation has a much higher level of a property called albedo than roads do.  Albedo is a measure of how much light a surface reflects – the more reflective a surface is the less it warms up in the sun and the more sunlight gets reflected back out into space.

As a result of all these cooling factors vegetation can have a significant mitigating effect on the urban heat island.  Studies have shown that an urban landscape with 30% tree cover can be up to 6 oC cooler than the same area would be without any trees at all [1].

It addition to the various ways in which trees cool our urban environments they also play an important role in absorbing carbon dioxide emissions, providing wildlife habitat and just looking beautiful.  Planting of fruit trees or other plants which produce edible crops can also contribute to the overall health of urban populations by providing a source of fresh food and have a positive environmental impact by reducing the distance that food must travel to reach consumers and the amount of land that must be cleared for agriculture.

The City of Sydney is already well ahead of many world cities in terms of level of tree cover but I will be asking Council to investigate the possibility of planting more trees on median strips on wide streets and other underutilised areas in order to make a contribution to improving the sustainability of our roads.

Lighter coloured road surfaces

Another way to improve the sustainability of roads and help counter the urban heat island effect through the use of higher albedo surfaces is to change the way roads themselves are constructed.  Instead of using black asphalt that makes up most roads (low albedo) the City could use lighter coloured concrete (higher albedo).

As roads cover about one third of the land in the City of Sydney local government area replacing their black asphalt surfaces with lighter coloured concrete (which reflects 30% more heat) could effectively increase the amount of heat reflected by the City by around 10%. 
 
Modelling carried out on Los Angeles, which has a similar climate to Sydney, showed that such an increase in reflected heat could reduce urban temperatures by up to 3 oC [1].  This would make our City a much more pleasant place to be in summer, reduce the incidence of heat related illness and, if used in conjunction with increased vegetation, potentially contribute to a reduction in energy used for air-conditioning of up to 61% [2].

More reflective road surfaces can be beneficial not just in terms of heat but also light.  While the City is currently undergoing a range of trials into saving energy through more efficient street lighting these trials are focusing entirely on the structures that emit the light, the lamps themselves, and not on the areas that receive it.

It is obvious that a lamp illuminating an area with light coloured surfaces will make the area brighter than the same lamp illuminating an area with dark coloured surfaces.  This means that if the dark asphalt roads and footpaths of the City were replaced with lighter coloured concrete surfaces the same illumination we have now could be achieved with less energy use. 

Studies from the USA have found that this could effectively reduce lighting costs by almost one third as a result of decreases in energy use and maintenance costs [3].  Given that the city currently spends around $5.5 million per year to power and maintain public lighting it is obvious that there are significant economic, as well as environmental, benefits in switching to lighter coloured paving surfaces. 

Rain gardens

As touched on earlier, part of the reason urban environments are generally warmer than natural ones is that the former don’t retain water.  While in a bushland environment most rain is absorbed by soil and taken up by plants in cities the bulk of it just runs off.  In order to combat the urban heat island effect we need to keep as much water as possible where it falls so that it can cool the environment through evaporation and so that vegetation can be grown without using up our valuable drinking water supply.

Preventing runoff also has the secondary benefit of reducing the amount of urban rubbish and pollutants washed into our waterways.

One means of keeping rainwater in the urban environment is through the use of rain gardens.  Rain gardens are like ordinary gardens except that they are planted in gutters to absorb the rainwater that would otherwise run off.  The City has set up a number of these but I feel they are working towards a sub-optimal goal. 

One of the stated aims of the City’s rain gardens is to clean urban stormwater run-off.  However I believe a more practical and achievable goal for the rain gardens should be to stop urban stormwater run-off entirely in all but the biggest storm events.  The rain gardens need to be built in such a way that stormwater is slowed down sufficiently to be entirely absorbed by the soil of the garden.  This doesn’t happen with the current rain gardens and water flowing at high speed washes soil, mulch and gravel into the drain, destroying the garden’s viability and adding potentially more contamination to the harbour than it removes.

If the demonstration sustainable street goes ahead I’ll be seeking to have the design of the rain gardens reviewed so that they can more effectively retain water, helping to cool our streets as well as keep urban contaminants out of our waterways.

Post script:  At the meeting of Council on 6th of December, following the publication of this article, Council CEO Monica Barone presented this memo to Council, calling for a sustainable demonstration street to be set up in Myrtle St, Chippendale.  This motion was passed by Council and I will now very much look forward to seeing how this project pans out over the coming months and years.

References:

[1] Haida Taha (1997)-Urban climates and heat islands: albedo, evapotranspiration and anthropogenic heat.  Energy and Buildings, volume 25, page 99-103.

[2] Arthur Rosenfeld et al (1998)- Cool communities: strategies for heat island mitigation and smog reduction. Energy and Buildings, volume 28, page 51-62.

[3] John Gadja and Martha VanGeem (2001) - A Comparison of Six Environmental Impacts of Portland Cement Concrete and Asphalt Cement Concrete Pavements.

 


Sustainable Barangaroo nothing but spin

September 10th, 2010

The Barangaroo Delivery Authority (BDA) is continuing with its practice of public deception, this time with its claims of environmental sustainability for the project. Thisbarangaroo-model-edit-2.bmp became apparent when City of Sydney Councillors were briefed on Monday 30th August by Lend Lease and BDA staff. It appears that claims that the development will be carbon neutral, water positive and zero waste are simply false. Further, the BDA has admitted that it has no power over the provision of light rail to the site and that this has been left in the hands of the state government.  Given state Labor’s appalling record on delivering public transport projects the prospects of efficient light rail integrating Barangaroo with the City appear to be slim. 

When I questioned Lend Lease staff about precise details of their carbon neutral strategy it emerged that only 3% of the energy used on the site will be from onsite renewable energy generation with the balance being accounted for by simply purchasing offsets - these can be cancelled at any time. There is no commitment to trigeneration aside from a vague statement about discussions with the City.  It seems from this briefing that claims of a zero carbon development, which have also been publicly touted by BDA Board member Lord Mayor Clover Moore, are at best spin and at worst blatantly untrue. 

When I sought more detail on the “water positive” claim by the BDA the Lend Lease presenter admitted that all potable water to the site would come from the same source as the rest of Sydney – Warragamba Dam. Claims that the site will be self sufficient for water were entirely false. 

Spin was again evident with claims of zero waste. The facts are that waste will be removed from the site with the Lend Lease presenter giving hazy details of the proposed use of an alternative waste treatment provider.  It was admitted that 13%barangaroo-model-edit-1.bmp of waste would still go to land fill. This is no different to what the City of Sydney already does to deal with part of it’s residential waste stream.  The simple fact is that the Lend Lease plan will not create a zero waste solution for Barangaroo. 

The last straw came when Lend Lease was asked for details of the light rail link. The presenter said that it was not the responsibility of the developer and that it would have to be provided by the state government. When the BDA were asked about the light rail they admitted that such a link to Barangaroo was desirable but there was no certainty that it would be delivered, despite it being used as a central plank in the “low car” plan for Barangaroo.  It should also be noted that the very first building application Lend Lease submitted for the project was a request for permission to build a commercial underground carpark for 800+ cars. This is another blow to the the promise that the site will be supported by sustainable transport. 

Lend Lease have lodged further amendments to the approved concept plan seeking increases in gross floor area, extra buildings and increases in height. If approved the result will be a gross overdevelopment and a misuse of public assets by a terminal state government. The BDA have engaged in deception since day one in relation to the type and scale of development on the site. It appears that they are also seeking to mislead the public on the sustainability aspects at Barangaroo. 

The Barangaroo development will be built from the ground up and so it is a unique opportunity to deliver a world leading example of cutting edge technology to deal with power generation, water recycling and capture, emission free public transport and waste treatment.  Following the briefing I have no confidence that such technology will even be required by the development consent and it looks like business as usual for Lend Lease and the BDA. Unless strict standards are mandated by the Minister for Planning, Barangaroo will be a lost opportunity to do something that sets new standards and seriously addresses the climate change impact of a large urban development.                                 

      

      

      

      

      

      

      

      

 

 

 

 

 


Encouraging low emissions technology

July 26th, 2010

The technology now exists to allow us to massively cut our greenhouse gas emissions, as I hope has become apparent from my many previous posts on this topic.  Renewable and low emissions energy technology has advanced so much in the last few years that the barriers against their widespread uptake, and against the replacement of dirty and inefficient coal fired power, are no longer technological but political.

One only need look at the pathetic attempts by both the Labor and Liberal parties over recent months to pass off a 5% reduction in emissions as meaningful action on climate change to know that the political will is nowhere to be seen in the major parties.

It has therefore fallen upon individuals to take responsibility for this most pressing of issues and next week I will attempt to use my role as a councillor to make it easier for indivduals to markedly reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.

I will be moving a motion that Council call for expressions of interest from providers of low emissions power production systems, such as solar or trigeneration technology.  Council will assess the technologies on offer from the providers and promote those deemed most appropriate to the City’s rate base and possibly offer a rate rebate (at the provider’s expense) to residents who install the chosen systems.

It’s a win win situation.  Residents get cheaper access to low emissions technologies which have been assessed as being reliable by the City.  The provider gets significant promotion of their product for free, which will likely more than offset their losses from providing a rebate.  The City gets to reduce emissions produced within the Local Government Area which will help it reach it’s 2030 environmental performance targets and ultimately we all win through inhabiting a slightly cleaner, greener planet.

This motion will be going to Council on the 26th of July and I hope the other Councillors will be able to act where state and federal governments have failed and support this important endeavour. 

Update:  My motion was enthusiastically seconded by Lord Mayor Clover Moore and supported unanimously by the Council.


A new era in solar thermal power

July 14th, 2010

Opponents of renewable energy love to trot out the tired old line that it can’t provide baseload power.  This statement has been incorrect for many years and as technology continues to develop (despite the pathetic investment made in this area by both state and Federal governments) the ability of renewables to meet all our power needs continues to grow.

One of the most exciting areas of development is in the field of solar thermal electricity generation, which I have previously discussed here.  Very briefly, solar thermal powersolar_array.jpg captures energy from the sun to produce heat to boil water which turns a turbine, in the same way as a conventional power station uses the heat from burning coal to turn a turbine.  The big advantage of solar thermal power over other forms of renewable energy generation, such as wind and solar photovoltaic (which generates electricity directly from sunlight via a chemical process) is that the energy produced can be easily stored.  Heat generated from sunlight can be contained in insulated storage units for several days, to be released to produce electricity when it is needed, including at night and on cloudy days.

Solar thermal electricity generation has already shown what it can do in large projects like the massive Andasol power plant in Spain.  Currently two thirds complete this plant already produces 100 MW of power for the local electricity grid and when completed in 2011 will save 450 000 tons of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere per year.  Such projects make an enormous contribution to improving sustainability but require a significant investment from governments – an investment which state and Federal governments in Australia are sadly unprepared to make.

Is there some way that individuals or local councils can take advantage of this exciting new technology in the absence of government leadership?  

Very soon there will be.

Work by an Australian company, to be officially announced in coming weeks, will make solar thermal power generation accessible to individuals with small scale generators capable of being installed on homes.  Equipped with insulated water tanks able to store heat - and therefore electricity generating potential - for up to three days, these systems will be able to produce more than twice the average household’s electricity needs.  Any electricity produced beyond what is used can be sold back to the grid.

Such technologies show that the tired old arguments of those opposed to renewable energy because of their own vested interests no longer hold any water.  I will be working to encourage the City of Sydney to install solar thermal power systems, along with a number of other sustainable energy technologies, in council owned buildings so that their potential can be demonstrated and independently assessed.  Ultimately I would like to see the City partner with the producers of whichever systems are shown to be most effective at reducing emissions in order to facilitate a roll-out of these to as many homes in the city as possible.  I look forward to working with staff over the coming months to make this happen and contribute to helping prevent dangerous climate change in a way that our governments are failing to do.
 


Bringing back life to Sydney Harbour

June 30th, 2010

Sydney Harbour runs a tight race with Uluru to take the title of Australia’s most iconic and recognisable feature and likely has as bigger role in bringing tourism revenue to our country.  However, while Uluru is protected by a National Park, World Heritage Declaration and joint management with the traditional owners of the land Sydney Harbour gets used as a dumping ground by industry and surrounding suburbs and has it’s shoreline carved up by greedy developers aided by a complicit state government. 

It hardly seems fair.

My Greens colleagues in state and federal parliment have fought long and hard to protect our waterways, Sydney Harbour included.  I have always supported this fight but the contributions I have been able to make in my role as a Councillor have been modest as Councils have little direct influence over marine environments.  They control land only down the to the low watermark and in central Sydney many areas of the foreshore are controlled by state Government bodies, such as the Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority and the Barangaroo Delivery Authority.

So when I came across some innovative research being carried out by a group of Australian scientists with the potential to dramatically improve the health of our local waters, in an area over which Council has direct control, I was most excited.

The research, being carried out by the Centre for Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities (EICC) at the University of Sydney, involves attaching concrete flowerpots to seawalls in the intertidalflowerpot zone to serve as artifical habitats for marine life.  Around 50% of the shoreline of the harbour is now seawalls, which replaced the natural sloping rocky shores that would have originally been home to a myriad of fish, crustaceans, molluscs and algae.  The seawalls don’t provide a suitable habitat for these organisms, which form an integral part of the marine ecosystem, and the negative effects on biodiversity that this causes are more significant than the effects of poor water quality - given how bad water quality is in the harbour this shows how serious the issue is.

The flowerpots serve as artificial rockpools and the results of trials carried out on the north side of the harbour have been stunning.  Within 6-12 months of being set up the number of species in the vicinity of the flowerpots tripled and biodiversity increased seven-fold.  The next stage in the research is to test what effect different types of concrete have on the results and a motion I moved at the last Council meeting, which was passed unanimously, will see the City of Sydney look at ways to partner with the EICC to conduct these trials.

I expect the benefits of this project to be not just environmental but also social.  It will give kids of the inner City the opportunity to partake in the quintessential childhood experience of searching for life in rockpools and give nature lovers of all ages so much more to appreciate on the harbour foreshore.  It is a solid step towards helping people to reconnect with our magnificent waterway.

I hope that a productive partnership between the City and the EICC can result and that this will be the first of many steps undertaken by Council over the coming months to improve the health of Australia’s most well known and well loved waterway. 

For more information on the artificial habitat research being undertaken by the EICC see the following videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mJPS9dX9uU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuDmTVHKi40&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4QVPfL4HEs&feature=related



If you would like to make a positive contribution to Australian politics, get involved by helping The Greens.

Greens Principles

  • Social and economic justice
  • Ecological sustainability
  • Peace and non-violence
  • Grassroots democracy